In the 1990s, SDSU relied on manual, paper‑based timetables. Department heads compiled courses on cork boards, and students navigated a maze of printed schedules. The process was labor‑intensive, and double‑bookings were commonplace, prompting early calls for automation.
The turn of the millennium introduced the first campus‑wide scheduling software. While the system reduced paperwork, its rigid algorithms often ignored extracurricular demands, producing new layers of conflict. Faculty feedback and student petitions sparked a series of upgrades that gradually refined the algorithmic logic.